Tariffs always cause a net welfare loss :: Economics

Tariffs always bowel movement a net wholesomebeing mischiefExplain and critically tax this statement.In this essay, I provide be discussing the force of protectionism, infocus, the impact of responsibilitys, import duties. As well discussing theoverall effect on well-being from the duty, the gainers and the loserswill need to be identified. I will illustrate this diagrammatically. Iwill then move to discuss the value of the optimal tariff imposition.As well as discussing the first best argument, I will also look at thevalue of second best arguments, examining whether or not tariffs doalways cause a net welfargon loss.A tariff requires the importer to pay a given fraction of the piece value to the government. This protects domestic producers by raisingthe world price well above the domestic price this of course has adownside for the consumers. A tariff works like a tax from theconsumers perspective in that location are transfers from the consumers to boththe government in the micturate of revenue and to the producers in the formof higher profits. This can be illustrated effectively by looking at body-build A, it shows the demand and supply curves for the home economy,Pa is the point where at that place is no hatful, where supply meets demand. Pwis the world price for the commodity, the point of free trade and Pw +t is the price plus the tariff. We can see that during free trade, atPw the home economy should import (Qf - Cf) but when a tariff isimplemented this means they will import (Qt - Ct). As we can see fromFigure A, the government will gain the revenue from the tariff, areaB. The price elevate in imports means that there is a reduced demand forthem and change magnitude demand for domestic producers. This results in again for the producer, area E. The loss for the consumer, area C, thisis where consumption is cut when Cf moves to Ct. Area A, is also aloss area, as when production increases from Qf to Qt production isinefficient, over the wor ld price so this area is the extra cost thatthe economy pay for producing the rock-steady at home. We can summarize thesegains and losses we can see that there is indeed a net loss forwelfare B - (E+A+B+C) + E = - (A-C).So are there any legal justifications for the imposition of tariffs.The strongest argument (some would say the only) in favour of a tariffcomes with the recognition that a domestic economy imports such a significant supply of the world market for a commodity that an